Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Worksheet Apr 2026

Section 3 was where things got interesting: List three spectral interferences and two chemical interferences that could cause false low results.

She aspirated the new solution. The hollow cathode lamp for lead flickered to life, shooting a precise violet beam through the flame. The detector chattered. The software plotted a new point.

The Trace Evidence

Dr. Elara Vance stared at the worksheet on her lab bench. It wasn't just any worksheet; it was the worksheet—the one she’d designed a decade ago as a teaching assistant, now smudged with coffee rings and the graphite ghosts of erased answers.

Too safe.

She glanced at the second section: Digest the sample using a 1:1 nitric acid solution. Filter. Dilute to volume. She had done this. She had taken water from the riverbank, just below the old battery plant. But when she ran the sample through the AAS—that beautiful, humming machine that shattered light into element-specific wavelengths—the result matched the EPA’s lie: 0.48 ppm. Safe.

“Section 1: Calibration Curve,” she read aloud, her breath fogging her safety glasses. On the worksheet, it was a simple instruction: Plot absorbance vs. concentration for lead standards (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 ppm). atomic absorption spectroscopy worksheet

Elara’s heart thumped. Chemical interference, she scribbled. Formation of refractory oxides. She grabbed a new vial. This time, she added a releasing agent—lanthanum chloride—to break apart any lead-oxide compounds that might be hiding the true metal content.

But tonight, the curve wasn't for a classroom. It was for the cold case of the Meridian River. For six months, the EPA had claimed the lead levels were safe. Elara suspected a lie. The townspeople were sick. The fish were dying. But the official reports showed a clean, linear slope—a perfect correlation. Section 3 was where things got interesting: List