Fsdss-281

### ✅ Verification - Ran `npm test` – all pass. - Deployed to Staging; reproduced steps now show UI validation message. - QA signed off on 2026‑04‑17.

Even if you’re not sure what the exact scope of FSDSS‑281 is, this template will help you gather the right information, move the work forward efficiently, and keep the whole team in the loop. | Action | Why it matters | How to do it | |--------|----------------|--------------| | Read the ticket title & description | Gives you the initial problem statement or feature request. | Open the ticket in your tracking system (Jira, Azure Boards, GitHub Issues, etc.). | | Check the “Issue Type” | Determines if it’s a bug, improvement, story, spike, or chore. | Look at the field that categorises the ticket. | | Look for attached documents | Specs, mock‑ups, logs, screenshots, or design docs often hide crucial details. | Expand any “Attachments” or “Links” sections. | | Identify the stakeholder | Knowing who raised the ticket helps you ask the right clarifying questions. | Check the “Reporter”, “Assignee”, “Watchers”, and any “Requested By” fields. | | Read the comments thread | Past discussion may already contain work‑arounds, decisions, or blockers. | Scan chronologically; watch for “✅ Done” or “❓ Open question”. | | Check related tickets | Dependencies or duplicates affect priority & scope. | Look at “Epic Link”, “Parent”, “Blocks/Is Blocked By”, “Duplicate Of”. | Tip: If any of the above is missing (e.g., no description or unclear acceptance criteria), add a short comment asking for clarification before you start digging. 2️⃣ Gather Context & Environment Details | Item | What to capture | Where to find it | |------|----------------|------------------| | Affected component/module | Name of service, library, UI page, API, etc. | Ticket labels, component field, or code‑search. | | Environment(s) | Dev, Staging, Production; OS, browser, device, version numbers. | Ticket, logs, or ask the reporter. | | Reproduction steps | Exact actions that trigger the issue (including data). | Test manually; record steps in a markdown checklist. | | Error messages / Stack traces | Full text, line numbers, correlation IDs. | Console logs, server logs, monitoring tools (Sentry, Datadog). | | Feature flag / config status | Whether a flag is on/off that could affect behaviour. | Config repo, launchdarkly console, environment variables. | | Recent changes | Commits, releases, migrations, DB schema changes that happened just before the problem surfaced. | Git history ( git log -p ), release notes, git bisect start point. | | Performance metrics | Latency spikes, memory usage, CPU, DB query times. | APM dashboards, CloudWatch, New Relic. |

### 📌 Summary *(One‑sentence description of the problem / feature)* FSDSS-281

### 🎯 Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1 - [ ] Criterion 2 - [ ] ...

### 📦 Release Notes - **FSDSS‑281** – Fixed crash when entering an invalid date on the Order creation page. ### ✅ Verification - Ran `npm test` – all pass

### 🚀 Post‑Release Monitoring - No new errors in Sentry (last 24 h). - Success rate for Order creation ↑ 0.2 %.

### 🧩 Investigation - **Hypothesis:** Date‑parsing library throws on out‑of‑range values. - **Evidence:** `date-fns` `parseISO` throws `RangeError` (see log line 1123). - **Next step:** Add explicit validation before calling `parseISO`. Even if you’re not sure what the exact

### 🔎 Reproduction Steps 1. Open `https://stg.example.com/orders` 2. Click **Create Order** 3. Fill form with **invalid date** (`2025‑02‑30`) 4. Submit → *Observe error*