I--- Ecusafe 3.0 -

Questions for the room: Has anyone stress-tested the RIT mechanism under high CAN bus arbitration loads (>80% utilization)? I’m seeing conflicting reports on latency jitter.

Legacy tools assumed an ECU’s firmware was static post-production. Ecusafe 3.0 introduces Runtime Integrity Tunnels (RIT) . Instead of checking a hash at boot (too late), it continuously verifies execution paths during operation. If a CAN injection or memory tamper is detected mid-cycle, the ECU doesn't just log an error—it instantly reverts to a signed, immutable fallback state without resetting the vehicle’s operation. i--- Ecusafe 3.0

Ecusafe 3.0 is not a firewall. It won’t stop a compromised diagnostic tool from flashing malicious code if you hand over physical access and valid credentials. No tool will. Questions for the room: Has anyone stress-tested the

We’ve spent the last decade playing whack-a-mole with automotive cyber threats. Flash a patch, wait for the next exploit. Rinse. Repeat. Ecusafe 3

But what it does do is raise the cost of persistence from weeks to months. It forces the adversary from a script-kiddie CAN replay into a full-lab hardware reverse engineering effort.