Little: Fish 2020

Based on the short story by Aja Gabel, Little Fish is a science fiction romance disguised as an indie drama. It presents a world ravaged by “Neuroinflammatory Affliction” (NIA), a Alzheimer’s-like pandemic that attacks memory. Unlike a normal virus, NIA doesn’t kill the body; it kills the past. One day, you remember your wife’s laugh. The next, she’s a stranger holding a stranger’s hand. The film follows Jude (Olivia Cooke) and Emma (Jack O’Connell) — a young, photojournalist couple in Portland, Oregon — as they fight to hold their love story together while the very architecture of memory crumbles around them. Hartigan makes a brilliant, counterintuitive choice: he refuses to show the spectacle of collapse. There are no burning cities, no zombie hordes, no martial law. Instead, the apocalypse is a quiet one. People wear blue wristbands indicating their “clear” status. Posters on bus stops ask, “Do you know where you are?” The news plays in the background, reporting rising infection rates like weather. The horror is mundane, bureaucratic, and deeply human.

The film ends with a voiceover from Jude, repeating the film’s opening lines: “I remember the first time I saw you. You were wearing a blue dress.” But now we realize: he is not speaking to the Emma who remembers. He is speaking to the Emma who is slowly becoming a stranger. And he chooses to keep speaking anyway.

But that is the trap. Love is not a solo project. Memory is not a shared hard drive where one person can hold the files for two. When Emma looks at Jude and feels nothing — or worse, feels vague unease — the film forces us to confront a terrifying possibility: that love is not eternal; it is neurological. That “forever” is just a series of electrical impulses, fragile as spider silk. Spoilers ahead, but a discussion of Little Fish demands it. little fish 2020

In lesser hands, this would become a melodramatic soapbox. But Hartigan treats it with philosophical restraint. There is a scene — one of the most quietly devastating in recent cinema — where Emma, already showing signs of early NIA, sits across from Jude in a clinical testing room. A doctor asks her to recall a memory. She cannot. Jude whispers, “It’s okay. I remember for both of us.”

But more than that, Little Fish is a radical act of empathy. It refuses the easy nihilism of “let them go.” Instead, it argues that love’s greatest act is not grand gesture or perfect memory. It is witnessing . It is saying, “You don’t remember us. But I do. And that’s enough for me to stay.” Based on the short story by Aja Gabel,

Olivia Cooke’s Emma is the anchor — pragmatic, guarded, a veterinarian whose emotional walls are built high. Jack O’Connell’s Jude is the open wound — gentle, earnest, a former mixed-martial-arts fighter with a soft center. Their chemistry is electric not in a Hollywood fireworks way, but in the quiet way two people learn each other’s rhythms. The early scenes — a clumsy meet-cute at a record store, a late-night drive talking about sharks (hence the title’s metaphor: small fish who forget where they’re swimming), a spontaneous wedding on a pier — feel achingly real.

In the final act, Jude learns of an experimental, highly risky treatment — a “reconstruction” of memory using leftover neural traces. Emma agrees to it, not because she believes it will work, but because she loves Jude enough to try. The treatment fails spectacularly. Emma emerges worse than before, her memories now a scrambled, violent mess. She attacks Jude in a dissociative episode. One day, you remember your wife’s laugh

Then the memory loss begins. Little Fish asks a question that feels almost too painful to entertain: If you lose your memories, do you lose your love?

In the sprawling landscape of pandemic cinema, most films have focused on the visible: the race for a cure, the collapse of society, the hoarding of toilet paper, the claustrophobia of lockdown. But Chad Hartigan’s Little Fish (2020) — tragically released just as the real world shut down — takes an inverse, far more intimate approach. It is not about the virus itself, but about the ghost that follows after: the slow, inexorable erasure of who we are to each other .

And then — in a choice that has haunted me since I first saw it — Jude makes a decision. He does not leave. He does not call a doctor. He takes Emma home. He lies beside her. He shows her their wedding video on a laptop. She watches two strangers — her former self and Jude — exchange vows. She does not recognize them. But she begins to cry. Not from recognition. From resonance .