Who Owns Alexander The Great It-s A Diplomatic Minefield. - The World News -
“Everyone wants a piece of the corpse,” said Dr. Nadia al-Hassan, a heritage lawyer based in The Hague. “But here’s the legal twist. If the tomb were found tomorrow in Egypt, under UNESCO’s 1970 convention, it would belong to Egypt. If found in international waters off Cyprus? That’s a maritime law nightmare. And if found in Turkey, near ancient Halicarnassus? Ankara has already passed a law declaring all ‘Macedonian-era artifacts’ state property.”
The core problem is simple, and maddening. Alexander’s final resting place—the Soma of Alexander in Alexandria, Egypt—was one of the ancient world’s most sacred pilgrimage sites. Roman emperors from Caesar to Caracalla made the trek. Then, sometime between the 3rd and 4th centuries AD, history lost track. Earthquakes, rising sea levels, and the slow decay of empires erased the tomb from memory. Unlike the relatively recent discovery of Richard III under a parking lot, Alexander has remained stubbornly, magnificently, missing .
— The World News
The unlikeliest claimant, however, may be Iran. In a little-noticed 2019 speech, a mid-level Iranian cleric argued that Alexander (whom Persian tradition calls “the Accursed” for burning Persepolis) was “a Zoroastrian by action, if not by name,” citing his respect for Persian satraps and his marriage to Roxana, a Bactrian princess. The cleric suggested that Alexander’s soul, if not his bones, belongs to the Iranian cultural sphere. “He destroyed our empire, then became it,” the cleric said. “That makes him ours.”
Meanwhile, a private American salvage company, Amphipolis Holdings LLC, has quietly secured exploration permits from Egypt’s Ministry of Antiquities to conduct ground-penetrating radar scans beneath the modern city of Alexandria. Their spokesperson declined to comment, but a leaked investor prospectus described the potential find as “the single most valuable unclaimed archaeological asset on Earth.” “Everyone wants a piece of the corpse,” said Dr
The diplomatic community has begun to take the matter seriously. Behind closed doors at the UN last month, the Greek ambassador circulated a non-paper proposing a “Framework for the Neutral Treatment of Ancient Conquerors,” which would bar any state from using a dead historical figure as a “tool of contemporary territorial or cultural aggression.”
Or rather, who gets to claim his absence of bones. If the tomb were found tomorrow in Egypt,
“It’s nonsense,” said Dr. Theodoros Koulianos, a professor of ancient history at the University of Athens, in an interview. “We have Plutarch, Arrian, the Alexander Romance. He sacrificed to Greek gods, consulted the Oracle at Delphi, and spread the koine Greek language. This is not interpretation. This is nationalism dressed as history.”
